Heroku vs AWS: Which Cloud Hosting to choose in 2022? (2023)

Both Heroku and AWS have become great examples of a rapidly developing and highly demanded area of technologies called cloud computing. To ensure that, let’s bring the statistics: the global cloud computing market grew from USD 145 billion in 2017 to USD 371.4 billion in 2020, experiencing a 255.8% growth in value.

Heroku vs AWS: Which Cloud Hosting to choose in 2022? (1)

Source: Statista

It is also expected to reach USD 832.1 billion by 2025 and USD 1 251.09 billion by 2028. Thus, the market size has already almost tripled during 4 years, and the forecasts promise we will see further market growth above the 300% mark.

Sounds impressive, right? But let’s get back to the Heroku vs AWS comparison.

AWS (or Amazon Web Services) is one of the key players in the IaaS and PaaS public cloud service market. A large number of PaaS and IaaS cloud technologies are built on top of Amazon Web Services. An example of a top AWS-based PaaS provider is Heroku. Just because of that, Heroku and AWS aren’t direct competitors in the same market space since Heroku is dependent upon AWS. So let’s find out the difference between them. In this article we cover several topics :

  • What is AWS
  • What is Heroku
  • Heroku vs AWS comparison
  • When to use AWS
  • When to use Heroku
Heroku vs AWS: Which Cloud Hosting to choose in 2022? (2)

AWS or Amazon Web Services is the most broadly used cloud platform that offers a massive collection of fully-featured services globally. Amazon offers all types of cloud computing models: PaaS, SaaS, IaaS.

Its services help developers to deal with databases, analytics, deployment, the powerhouse of storage, networking and enable customers to build more resilient, secure, and complex systems on top of AWS.

(Video) Heroku Or AWS? Which cloud provider is right for you?

The most popular AWS services are:

  • Amazon Simple Storage Service (or Amazon S3)
  • Elastic Compute Cloud (or EC2)
  • AWS Lambda

These services are a part of the AWS IaaS platform, which is a subject of comparison in this article.

Heroku is a container-based cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS) built on top of AWS that developers use to build, deploy, and scale applications. If you use Heroku, your apps run in Linux containers from Heroku called dynos.

Heroku takes a carefully selected set of AWS services and packages them into an easy-to-use platform for app development. It is much more user-friendly compared to EC2, for example. Developers do not need to worry about setting up the infrastructure or managing the AWS environment because Heroku has already taken care of it.

Heroku’s bottom line is to get the environment for deploying and developing processes without the hassle of machine setup.

As a part of the Heroku experience, you get more than 100 add-ons that serve a variety of purposes, like content management, notifications, alerts, monitoring, security, and others.

  • Platform background — choosing a platform that will become the basis for the future app, take into account its development history and vendor that updates, supports, and improves that platform.
  • Supported regions — geographic availability of services around the world.
  • Community and popularity — it’s always great when technology has a large community of developers and a large set of already solved issues.
  • Features — some facts about platforms and opportunities developers get using a platform.
  • Addons and services — since both platforms are packed with additional services that empower developers and facilitate fast and effective building, deploying, and scaling of web applications, they are worth mentioning.
  • Pricing — the cost of using services always stays a topic for discussion, regardless of the size of a customer company and project budget.
  • Ease of use — more complex platforms require skilled developers and their time to configure the platform. Their working hours are also to pay so that criteria can become an additional latent expense.
  • Deployment speed and flexibility — the balance between opportunities for manual configuration and the speed of deploying a ready-to-use environment can be crucial for some types of projects.

As all criteria are defined, let’s jump to the comparison itself. We prepared a short, convenient table where you can find the whole point of the Heroku vs AWS comparison.

Enjoy reading!

Comparing the AWS IaaS platform and Heroku as a PaaS, it’s good to highlight a difference between these two cloud models:

IaaS provides developers with the products they need to build a development environment on top of it. PaaS gives a ready-to-use environment where developers can push code, make some basic configurations, and run applications. Now go to the comparison:

(Video) The Best Alternatives To Heroku - Theo's Deployment Recommendations

Supported regions

Heroku supports some states in the United States, Europe, Ireland, Australia, Japan.

AWS has 81 Availability Zones within 25 geographic regions around the world.

Community and popularity

Heroku earned a reputation in a certain niche of rapid app development and building highly scalable web and mobile apps. According to StackOverflow questions statistics, developers’ interest in the Heroku platform was at its peak after the commercial success in 2010–2013 years, then it had remained stable until a new wave of interest in 2020 occurred.

With a wide array of services, the first position on the huge cloud computing market, and millions of sites and apps based on AWS, Amazon services have gained great recognition. There is a big developers community, a bunch of articles and use-cases on best practices, and a steadily increasing growth in popularity. According to StackOverflow questions statistics, developers’ interest in Amazon’s most popular services is constantly growing.



  • Flexible runtime environment based on managed, isolated Linux containers called dynos.
  • Simple manual apps scaling
  • Great security since Heroku is built on top of AWS
  • Powerful CLI that helps to develop and manage Heroku applications
  • Integration with GitHub
  • First-class languages support for Ruby, Java, PHP, Python, Node, Go, Scala, and Clojure
  • Switching to alternative PaaS options or even AWS can be a daunting task that requires a lot of nontrivial work.
  • There is an option to create a new server in 10 seconds using Heroku Command-Line


  • EC2’s virtual computing environment is based on instances with various OS
  • Several instance types optimized to fit different use cases
  • Configurable security and network access
  • Direct access to the processor and memory of the underlying server.
  • Auto-scaling up and down during demand spikes and recessions
  • A quick restart of all app servers by using a single command
  • Support of multiple popular programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, and Node.js, etc

Addons and services

Heroku offers hundreds of addons for various purposes like security, mailing, content management, testing, alerts, notifications. It comes with more than 700 pages of one-click-deployment third-party components and libraries. Moreover, the Heroku platform has multiprogramming language support via buildpacks that automate the build process for other languages different from officially supported first-class languages.

AWS comprises over 200 fully-featured products including computing, storage, databases, analytics, networking, mobile, developer tools, management tools, IoT, security, and enterprise applications.

(Video) AWS vs Heroku, which one is better for web hosting?


Depending on the type of your app Heroku has 4 different service plans. They start with a free plan for non-commercial apps with 550–1000 dyno hours per month up to the service plan with custom pricing for enterprises. A dyno with 512MB RAM costs 25$ per month (0.034$ per hour), while the most powerful dyno comes with 14GB RAM for 500$ per month (0.694$ per hour).

AWS offers free tiers for every service with limited opportunities but at no cost. As for EC2 instances, there are 750 hours of free compute capacity per month. AWS instance pricing starts from 3$ per month (0.0042$ per hour) for one instance with 512MB RAM up to 39 312$ per month (54.6$ per hour) for a highly productive instance with 6 144GiB RAM and 448 vCPU. So we can say that server capacity is unlimited.

Ease of use

Heroku is known for the simplicity of its use. The efforts required to get the app running on the settled environment are maybe a few lines of code and a git push with no prior setup of any kind in place. Tasks like scaling, management, and application monitoring can be easily accomplished with the intuitive Heroku platform dashboard. There is great comprehensive documentation with step-by-step guides for every first-class language support and all Heroku essentials. Developers don’t need highly specialized knowledge and skills to use Heroku. Heroku automates a lot of processes of setting up a runtime environment including server, database, OS, monitoring tools, and much more.

Every service of AWS is well documented and comes with tutorials for various cases. AWS is presented with a very user-friendly interface called the AWS Management Console, which provides access to a wide number of applications and services. Working with AWS developers deal with IaaS, so they should have the skills to manage the whole EC2 infrastructure and handle the applications, data, operating system, middleware, and runtimes. It logically follows that controlling application deployment and EC2 infrastructure requires a skilled specialist, who will maintain the whole environment. And that is a latent expenditure that AWS has.

Deployment speed and flexibility

To deploy an app on Heroku often need less than 30 minutes. Developers love Heroku for quick deployment. That is possible because Heroku is a PaaS platform that offers a ready-to-use environment that allows deploying the code fast. However, that leads to less flexibility compared to IaaS platform opportunities.

The deployment process with AWS is quite complicated, and launching multiple app instances for an app with the average workload can take a serious amount of time and requires skills. But in return, AWS equips developers with tools for full control over the resources.

  • Heroku is a cloud Platform as a Service built on top of AWS, while AWS is a cloud services provider of a massive collection of solutions that includes PaaS, SaaS, IaaS.
  • Heroku was acquired by Salesforce after its commercial success, while AWS was developed and owned by Amazon.
  • AWS offers support for a wider range of geographical zones than Heroku (25 regions around the world with AWS vs some states in the United States, Europe, Ireland, Australia, Japan with Heroku).
  • Amazon Web Services have a very huge community of software developers who actively use them. Amazon holds the first position on the huge cloud computing market as a cloud service provider. Heroku, for its part, earned a reputation as a cloud platform in a certain niche of rapid app development.
  • Both Heroku and AWS offer a wide range of addons and services for various purposes. Heroku offers addons for the PaaS model, while AWS offers services for IaaS, PaaS, SaaS models.
  • Heroku has 4 different service plans, one of which is a free plan for non-commercial apps with limited up to 1000 free hours of computing capacity containers called “dynos”. AWS offers free tiers for every service and 750 free hours of computing capacity per month for EC2 instances.
  • AWS is cheaper than Heroku. One compute capacity with 512MB RAM costs 3$ per month for an AWS instance and 25$ per month for a Heroku dyno.
  • Heroku is known for the simplicity of its use. The efforts required to get the app running on the settled environment are maybe a few lines of code and a git push with no prior setup of any kind in place.
  • Heroku offers less flexibility and control over the computing infrastructure, but a high deployment speed. AWS provides great flexibility but requires a skilled specialist to manage the computing infrastructure.

Heroku and AWS serve similar goals but should be used in different use cases.

Heroku vs AWS: Which Cloud Hosting to choose in 2022? (4)
(Video) AWS vs GCP vs Azure vs fixed price cloud

Use AWS if:

• You need full control over the server and environment configurations

• Your app requires much more than 14GB RAM dynos

• You don’t want to be confined by a PaaS platform and its way of doing things

• You need auto-scaling

Use Heroku if:

• You have no desire and opportunities to manage computing infrastructure

• You have no time to deploy IT infrastructure by yourself

• You want a clearly defined expenditure on infrastructure for every used dyno (AWS requires a skilled specialist and time to deploy the infrastructure)

• You like Git

If there are any questions left on Heroku vs AWS comparison, feel free to contact us.

(Video) Where to deploy - AWS, Google Cloud, Heroku, Digital Ocean?

The original article: https://sumatosoft.com/blog-post/heroku-vs-aws-which-cloud-hosting-to-choose


1. Cloud Provider Comparisons: AWS vs Azure vs GCP
(A Cloud Guru)
2. Picking My Next Tech Stack - AWS vs Firebase vs Azure vs Heroku
(Program With Erik)
3. 3 Alternatives for Heroku's Free Tier - Full Stack & API Hosting
(Traversy Media)
4. How to Burn Money in the Cloud // Avoid AWS, GCP, Azure Cost Disasters
5. I tried 5 Firebase alternatives
6. Firebase vs Heroku
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Last Updated: 13/04/2023

Views: 5974

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lakeisha Bayer VM

Birthday: 1997-10-17

Address: Suite 835 34136 Adrian Mountains, Floydton, UT 81036

Phone: +3571527672278

Job: Manufacturing Agent

Hobby: Skimboarding, Photography, Roller skating, Knife making, Paintball, Embroidery, Gunsmithing

Introduction: My name is Lakeisha Bayer VM, I am a brainy, kind, enchanting, healthy, lovely, clean, witty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.